Heroes
and their Quests
By: Amol, Coralie, Gabriel, and Madalena
Introduction
Over the course of seven weeks we have been introduced to various documentaries all conveying different messages and themes. This week we will be discussing qualities of Heroes and their quests. Using a new theory formulated by Joseph Campbell we are able to grasp the concept of Heroes and their quests much better than before. Throughout this blog we will pin point certain actions taken by our heroes, Joe Simpson, Simon Yates and Philippe Petit and find the link between The Journey of the Hero and their actual adventures.
Touching the Void
Touching the
Void, a 2003 documentary film directed by Kevin MacDonald,
lasting 106 minutes and produced by John Smithson, depicts the tale of two alpinists,
Joe Simpson and Simon Yates, in their quest to climb the previously unconquered
West Face of the Siula Grande, in Peru. The structure of the movie is what
makes it such a success, as actors reenact the journey described in interviews
by both Simpson and Yates, which allows for a greater sensorial experience for
the audience.
The structure of the movie, which is separated into seven
distinct parts, simply reflects the number of days the journey lasted. The first
day starts off with both Simpson and Yates leaving the base camp under beautiful
weather conditions, to begin what they believe to be a 3 to 4 day climb. They
decide to climb up the mountain alpine style, which is an older technique. This
method of climbing has Simpson and Yates carry very little supplies; they rely
on each other to survive (tied together for security) and must climb up and
down the mountain without the assistance of a third party.
After the first day, Simpson and Yates managed to walk the
4-mile long valley which leads to the bottom of Siula Grande, and have gotten
halfway up the 6 356 meter face. On the second day however, the weather conditions
deteriorated and Simpson and Yates were soon caught in a severe snowstorm. As
they approached top of the face, both men were soon caught in what they would
later discover to be “flutings”, which are accumulations of deep and loose
snow. After ascending only 200 feet in about 5-hours, they decide to settle
down for the night. Waking up on the third day, they found clear weather
conditions, which allowed them to reach the summit at a faster pace then
expected. As they hurried down, running low on supplies, the weather changed
for the worst and they were soon caught in a white-out (severe snow storm,
allowing for little to no visibility). Consequently, Yates falls off the ridge.
Being tied to Simpson and having fallen only a few feet, he quickly climbs back
up unhurt, and they decide to rest for the night. In order to climb such great
heights they must keep hydrated, only now they have exhausted their gas supply,
which was used for the melting of snow.
The clearer weather allows them to descend the face of the
mountain at a faster pace. This soon changes however as Simpson suffers a fall.
He has severely broken his leg, and is aware that he is condemned to dying on
the mountain. Yates however, decides to lower Simpson down the mountain at 300
feet increments using their ropes. While being lowered, Simpson feels the angle
of the mountain get steeper, and falls of the face. Hanging off of the cliff, injured
and weak, Simpson had no way of either climbing back up the rope or swinging to
get a hold of the cliff in order to let Yates lower him down more. Yates, unaware
of Simpson’s situation, could only wait for him to take action. After an hour
and a half, Yates took the life changing decision of cutting the cord and
therefore possibly killing his friend. He settled down for the night, knowing
that he had possibly ended his friend’s life. Simpson however, was still alive
and was struggling to survive. He had fallen into a crevasse.
On the morning of the fifth day, Yates continued his journey
down until he reached the cliff. It became clear to him why Simpson could not take
his weight off the rope and saw the crevasse Simpson had fallen into. He
continued his decent and soon reached the base camp where he had to
psychologically deal with what he had done. Simpson, who slowly woke up that
morning, called out to Yates but it was in vain as his friend was no longer
there. He had two options: Try to climb the crevasse or lower himself deeper to
find an exit. Unsuccessful with the first option, he lowers himself even deeper
into the crevasse and luckily finds another exit point he could reach. Shortly
after noon, he finally emerged to the sight of the immense glacier.
His journey was not over; he still had to walk across the
4-mile long valley and the glacier with a broken leg and a shortage of food and
water. He luckily found Yates’ footprints and followed them, crawling down the
glacier. The overall task of crawling for miles was too much, but Simpson showed
signs of extreme courage as he broke down the task and set realistic goals for
himself. After clearing the glacier, he must make his way through boulders and
rocks in order to get to base camp. He knew he had to hurry because his
physical and mental states were quickly deteriorating. Every step is a
struggle, pain runs through his leg. He struggled on and later that day, found
running water, giving him strength to push on. He continued his decent, the
following day and as night fell, fog slowly settled in. He was now drifting in
and out of consciousness and had difficulty moving any further. He made it to
their waste field. Joe began calling out
Simon’s name and to his surprise, was heard by him. Yates heard someone calling
his name. He could not believe it was Simpson but got out of his tent to
investigate. He found his friend lying a hundred yards from the camp. He had managed to survive his ordeal.
The
Hero’s Journey
In Joseph Campbell’s book, The Hero with a Thousand Faces he explains the monomyth, or more
commonly known as, The Journey of the
Hero. Campbell formulated his theory with the analysis of multiple myths.
His formula was shortened done into three sequences. The first part of a Hero’s
quest is “Seperation” where a hero must leave his ordinary world to practice
and gain skills that will help him prevail. Once he has received all the
training he can get he is initiated into the quest and must battle his/her way
through obstacles, this constituent is called “initiation”. Once they have
completed and vanquished their quest, the hero returns home with the prize or
feeling of redemption. The “return” brings the hero back to square one, their
home where they live life as an ordinary person once again.
In Touching the
Void the status quo would be Simon and Joe living their lives in England.
Having a passion for mountain climbing, they decide to set their own goal; to
be the first people to climb the west face of Siula Grande. Along their journey
to Peru, they meet a gentleman named Richard Hawking who remains at the base
camp to assist them when they return. They leave base camp to conquer their
quest. The higher they climb the more they struggle for survival as unplanned
weather conditions are thrown their way and the gas tank is emptied. Their
moment of crisis occurs once Joe has fallen off a cliff and breaks his leg. They
must adapt to their new situation, in order to climb down the mountain alive. After
being pulled down to quickly and having the mountaineers shouts be muffled by
the howling wind of the snow storm, Joe is thrown off a cliff, and hangs in the
void for more than an hour, above a crevasse, Joe unable to get himself back
onto the mountain, plummets to his “so-called death”. The decision to cut the
rope was not a pleasant choice. In most myths a hero’s return is always a
majestic and joyful one, but in Simon’s case he must deal with the criticism
accompanied by his decision to cut the rope. They return home safely, and are directly brought to a hospital for medical attention.
Man
on Wire
Man on Wire, a 2008 British documentary film, directed by James
Marsh and produced by Simon Chinn, presents the extraordinary story of a man pursuing
his dream at all cost. The movie, which is constructed in a similar way to Touching the Void, in the way of having
interviews conducted asking the main characters to tell their story. Along with
these interviews there are reenactments of their story. In the case of Man on Wire draws emotions from its
viewers, allowing for a sensational experience.
Philippe Petit, a
French high-wire artist, dreamed of walking across the World Trade Center (WTC)
since the age of 17 and finally did at the age of 25. The movie shows how difficult
of a journey it was to reach his goal. It all started when he read a news
article about the possible construction of two buildings, which would become
the tallest the world had ever seen. He knew that there was a slight chance he
could achieve his goal but believed in it anyway. He practiced his skills as a
high-wire artist and eventually became extremely good. He undertook his first life-changing
walk when he crossed the towers on the Notre-Dame Cathedral. After successfully
performing this act, he was hooked and knew he would one day achieve the cross
between the WTC.
Months after this first success, Philippe
Petit read a second article about the World Trade Center, which described how
the towers were going to be built. Philippe Petit could not have been any
happier. This meant that his dream was now tangible, and that it was now
possible for him to undertake such a task. His training continued as the towers
were being built and in 1973, he crossed the Sydney Harbour Bridge, in
preparation for his task the following year. Being that this act was once again
a success, Philippe Petit grew more confident and prepared for the World Trade
Center act. After visiting the towers and gathering information and help in
order to achieve his quest, he decided that he was ready and travelled to New
York City for what would be his culminant performance. That day however, it seemed
obvious that he would not be able to reach his goal. He had not prepared enough
for the task at hand and would surely fail if he attempted. Reluctant, Philippe
Petit travelled back to France and this time, prepared himself better.
A few months
later, he was back in New York City, happy with his preparation and ready as he
would have ever been for the performance. After sneaking in both towers of the
World Trade Center at night, Philippe Petit and his team prepared the wire for
the event. After dropping the wire and having to pull it back up, Philippe
Petit was finally ready for his lifetime goal. It was now morning and although
exhausted, he decided that he had to take a leap of faith and climb on the
wire. His act, consisting of a total of eight crossings, lying down on the
wire, kneeling on it and waving to the crowd below, ended when he realized that
he had achieved his dream: he would not die to extend the moment any longer. After
being arrested and charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct, Philippe
Petit returned to France where he continued his career and passion as a high-wire
artist.
The Hero and his Quest
As we mentioned previously, the topic of this blog
revolves around the hero, and their quest. A hero is someone who experiences a
life changing journey, leaving his or her “ordinary” world and entering a “special”
world. Every hero gets called to an adventure, with a bit of help they depart
on their journey leaving their ordinary lives behind. Throughout their journey,
the hero is faced with challenges and obstacles that they have to overcome.
There is a moment where we see the hero’s weakness but he pushes forward, to
beat their goal. Man On Wire relates
to what we learned in class because Philippe Petit does something no one has
ever done. Philippe begins his journey by setting a personal goal, which is to
place a wire between the Twin Towers and walk across it. One day Philippe was
reading the newspaper and saw a picture of the World Trade Center and had an
inspiration of attaching a wire from one building to the other. In order to achieve his goal he must prepare
by separating himself from his immediate world and to focus on enhancing his
wire walking skills. As practice, Philippe decides to walk across the clock
towers of Notre-Dame church in Paris, and later on, walk across a bridge in
Sydney, Australia. It takes him and his partners several years to prepare for
the performance. Not only must Philippe practice, his friends along with him
must create a concrete plan to break into the towers and set up the equipment.
These preparations are part of the quests “initiation” along with the actual
performance conducted by Philippe. Once he completes his stunt, he returns to
his life on the ground and is welcomed by fans and news reporters asking for
explanations. After clearing his name of the charges held against him, he
returns to a life of fame and recognition, and is showered with appreciation
and respect for his stunt.
The
Hero within Ourselves
These films
both exemplified the qualities that every human being possesses: heroism. Every
individual can be a hero, it's just a matter of showing it and expressing it.
Joe and Simon were both normal individuals that carried out daily routines just
like the rest of us, with the exception of their mountain climbing hobby, but
they were heroes. Joe from Touching the
Void and Philippe from Man on Wire
both had to face an excruciating situation, but they ultimately persevered and
showed their heroism. Being a hero does not necessarily mean that one must slay
a dragon to save a princess or has to save a planet against an evil villain.
For Joe, he
broke his leg, faced dehydration, faced a seemingly dead end but despite all
that, was able to escape with his life. He motivated himself by setting small
goals to show himself that it was in fact not impossible. He is a hero because
he was able to conjure his will power and continue moving forward. Being strong
minded forced him to move ahead and to push harder and harder for survival.
Although his strong will to live was based on his fear of dying alone, he
managed to use it in his favor. His body
was prepared to stop him from progressing but it was his mind, wishful thinking
(finding Simon) that had him hop along till the base camp. They are qualities
which we all possess, but often only use when a certain situation arises.
Similarly Philippe, in Man on Wire,
did something perceived to be impossible. Getting to the top floor of the
buildings was impossible because it was prohibited by law to these people. So,
he improvised and used hideouts at night to install equipment and disguised
himself to have access and take photos. Like Joe, he showed ingenuity and found
a way to achieve his goal.
The video below
explains certain scenes and scenarios which occur during the walk across the
twin towers. It is a great clip because we have both, the director’s
perspective and Philippe Petit’s perspective on the film and on his work. It
answers the question “Why?” without really answering the audience’s question.
Being a hero is
someone that can defy the odds and portray "god-like" qualities and
abilities to achieve a goal. The quest is often what makes a hero. Throughout
the hero’s quest there are obstacles they must face, which may fool them and
make them do something impossible. A broader way to look at it is that the life
is a quest, in its own; that we all try to conquer in our lives and every
single person must apply qualities such as perseverance, hard work, management in
order to live happily and successfully. But there are also smaller experiences,
like the ones Philippe and Joe had, that are quests that can change a person's
life. Both films, in which we see those experiences, we can understand how Joe
and Philippe conquered their respective quests because we see firsthand, that
these people displayed extraordinary qualities in the face of challenges
presented on the journey and we realized that we too, though it may seem
impossible, can exhibit the same heroism.
These films
truly show us all that we have the ability to be heroes. If there are
situation, or quests as Joe and Philippe experienced, that truly challenge you
beyond what you think are your limitations, it will provoke you to surpass
those and make you learn something about yourself. What we saw with Joe and
Philippe were life changing moments, but we may conduct acts of heroism without
even knowing it. Organizing social fundraisers to support a certain group of
people is a form of heroism, because you may not be changing your life, but
your changing the lives of others for the better all while achieving a goal you
set yourself. Or on a broader context, a fundraiser that helps needy children across
the planet is also an act of heroism. We all achieve such acts almost on a
daily basis, we organize our ideas so that the goals can be achieved and we
ultimately help ourselves and/or others become better people all while
discovering something new about ourselves.
Conclusion
Heroes can be any one of us, we do not
need to be dropped into a radioactive substance to gain super powers or be bitten by a radioactive bug. All we need is our will power and our passions to lead us
towards our goals. A goal to one person is a quest for another. We are aware of
our strengths and weaknesses and are capable of pushing ourselves forwards and will accomplish our goals. Ordinary people are heroes because they manage to find
something worth doing that will make themselves push and grow as a person. It is the little things which create a heroic image of certain people. When we were younger adults would ask us who are hero was, we would answer our mother or father because they were capable of many great things in our child eyes. Now that we have grown into adults the term Hero has changed because our eyes have given us knowledge of the world around us. In a figurative sense hero means Batman, Harry Potter, Hercules etc. but at the end of the day we realize the people we look up to, our models, whether they are celebrities, business men, family members, they are the true Heroes.
I really enjoyed reading your blog. I agree with what you are saying, but I think there is something selfish about being a hero. In Touching the Void, I remember Philippe saying that we was trying to get out of the crevice because he didn't want to die alone. Also, they climbed the mountain because they knew that if they survived they would be the first ones to do it. Don't get me wrong, I still think they are very courageous heroes, but I think that in being a hero comes with a little selfishness.
ReplyDeleteStephanie Nicholls-Dempsey
Awesome work guys! I want to begin by saying that Simon and Joe both are incredible climbers who had the necessary talent, gear and tactics to climb this atrocious mountain. However, many obstacles such as snowstorms and Joe’s broken leg, made them yield from their adventure. If they were to face this mountain once more, Joe and Simone could definitely achieve the top.
ReplyDeleteI am not sure what triggered this man to walk on a wire along the World Trade Center, but I hope it was worth it. Additionally, this man had a lack of sleep. This could of affected his walk significantly. One false step killed this man assuredly as he was not attached whatsoever.
I would relate these two films with the man who threw himself from space to break the sound barrier. There are many people in the world who have insane ideas. They want to accomplish a task by risking their own lives and just by forgetting a detail or missing a step, death occurs. This however, creates an abundance amount of entertainment because this is what people love to watch in today’s world.
Jason Carrier
A job well-done to all members of this team! The summaries for both documentaries were very clearly presented, especially that of Touching the Void. The struggles they faced were distinctly enumerated, and you spoke about the actions they took to overcome them. For example, when Joe was forced to finish his journey alone, you mention the courage he displays by setting realistic goals and tasks in order to successfully carry them out. Further, you all displayed a very good understanding of Joseph Campbell’s “Journey of the Hero” by connecting it to the screening. Each step is identified with the stages of Simon and Joe’s climb, and allows the reader to truly view them as heroes. The one thing I did feel could have enhanced this blog post was a further explanation of how the hero was received. It was mentioned briefly that Simon had to succumb to criticism, upon his return, for having cut the rope. This could have led into a more detailed discussion of class theory: how society reacts to a hero’s actions. As we learned, they can honor them, not recognize them, and in Simon’s case, they can disdain them. Although it is supplementary information, mentioning this might have allowed the reader to form their own opinion on the criticisms Simon faced, instead of merely learning the opinions of others.
ReplyDeleteMan on Wire is certainly another example of heroism and perseverance. Despite the fact that Philippe was unprepared the first time he visited New York, he took it as a motivation to work harder and ultimately achieve what he set out to do. Petit was able to accomplish this goal not only because of the work he put in, but also because he believed in himself. While most of us cannot say that we have crossed the WTC by wire, I believe that we can all relate to Philippe’s accomplishment. We have all, at some point in time, set goals for ourselves. Sometimes they are fulfilled; others they are not. Nevertheless, I most certainly can share in the understanding that no goal worth fulfilling comes easy, and there will undoubtedly be trials along the way. As you mentioned, when you challenge yourself beyond your limitations, you learn something new about yourself. This, I believe, is the stepping stone on the path to becoming a hero.
Leigh Gantman
Another excellent blog! I really appreciate the effort that went into summarizing each film. In fact, I’ve seen Man on Wire a few years ago and while reading your summary, I was reminded of some interesting and important key points.
ReplyDeleteAs we all know, society can sometimes honor, disdain or not recognize a hero after their return from their journey. In the case of Touching the Void, Simon Yates returned home with a large amount of criticism. However, making the decision to cut the rope connecting Joe Simpson and himself was a difficult, and perhaps, the right decision. In a way, this is a heroic act due to the fact that rather than losing two lives, one – being his own- was saved. In Man on Wire, even Philippe Petit was criticized for his high wire act and was taken into custody and charged.
These two stories remind me of a four year old boy named Braydon Hampton in Maryland who saved his three year old cousin after she fell into a pool without adult supervision. Braydon was able to swim to her and pull her out of the pool unharmed. After the event, Braydon’s cousin calls him a “real life superhero”. The idea of being a hero most often comes from big ideas or dreams. In the case of Yates and Simpson, they dreamed to climb a mountain, where as Petit wanted to cross the WTC on a rope. For Braydon, and most young boys, they dream to one day become a superhero, and that he did.
All in all, heroes are found in numerous different shape, sizes and colors, and as your group puts it very well, they do not have to “be bitten by a radioactive bug”.
Zachary Pilling
Touching the Void really got me thinking. I have seen many documentaries before, but never have I thought it could look like this. The way it was presented was mind-blowing, and I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. It was like an action movie being presented in the form of a documentary. I was very impressed.
ReplyDeleteMy understanding of a hero has always been the same~a man in a cape who fights crime, or someone who saves lives. This movie altered my thinking. I realize what heroes these two mountain climbers really were, and i also got a better understanding of what a hero can be. I really think just about anyone can be a hero in their own ways, maybe to their families and friends, or to themselves. People considered Joe and Phillipe heroes for what they had gone through, but I don't think one has to comb the most challenging mountain in the world and have beyond difficult struggles to come down to be considered a hero. Those little good deeds a person does in his lifetime makes him a hero in their own special way, even if they do not get the attention from the media in the way that Joe and Phillipe did.
Josh Hayes
A very good entry with thorough summaries.
ReplyDeleteI have a slightly differing opinion about Touching the Void (which by the way, I enjoyed immeasurably). Instead of a man’s heroic journey and metamorphosis into something high and mighty, I saw their story as a consequence of trying to play God and take on nature as an equal. Simon and Joe took on the mountain out of mere cockiness and out of the desire to be praised by the public and the climbing community. I found it also symbolic how when they reached the top of the mountain – ultimately their goal – they barely took any time to appreciate it or bask in its immense glory. But as they continued down the mountain, that’s when things started to really go wrong and I saw all of it as punishment. Though, not from a single deity, but perhaps from a force greater than mankind. Nature proves itself as an indomitable force, incomparable to that of a human.
Upon watching this film through to the end, I am reminded of the Latin phrase Memento Mori, meaning “Remember your mortality” or “Remember that you will die.” In my opinion this applies to Simon and Joe because their journey was one of humility and humanization.
Though, the human self is one that shows endurance as well. The fact that Simon and especially Joe survived this ordeal proves that humans hold their own kind of small power as well, and that is something to be proud of.
To start off, you did a great thorough summary of both films. I thought the movie Touching The Void was really well made; even though Simon and Joe were narrating in between scenes of re-enactment, I was still really worried about them, wondering if they would get through it and survive. The director somehow managed to mix the narration and the action so subtly that we come to think that they can’t survive, even if they are there to tell how it happened. I feel like Simon had to face critics that weren’t needed; if he hadn’t cut the rope, they both would’ve died one way or another. By cutting the rope, he saved them both. Then, for Man On Wire, I liked your choice of videos; it really showed the process of making Petit’s dream possible, but also how the director and him were getting along. In general, for both films, I find one downside; I think it is sad that these three men, and also people in today’s society, go to such dangerous and extreme extents in order to realise their dream or satisfy their thirst for challenges and adrenaline.
ReplyDeleteStefanie Pharand
Firstly, great discussions for both films. From my opinion, Touching the Void was a very good documentary and lesson towards society. It tells us to push ourselves in life to achieve our goals and by doing that, we have to take risks because no mater how much we want it, we have to go outside of our comfort zone to achieve success. This documentary struck me because I play soccer at a very high level and to be able to do well, I have to push myself no matter how much it hurts because I have a goal to achieve and that goal is to play University level or even national level soccer. These are very big goals and to achieve those, I have to take risks. What I mean by risks, is to sometimes take away other things that I love doing so I can concentrate on these goals. In conclusion, Touching the Void was very motivational, especially because Joe's life was on the line. He showed us that when you you know you're dying, anything is possible.
ReplyDeleteWeslé Aucoin
First off, you guys did a great job with the film summaries. I think i would have to agree with Aileen on the fact that yes, Joe and Simon are in some way heroes, but i doubt that their first intentions were to simply climb it for the fun of it. This documentary kept me on the edge of my seat, literally. I loved the mix of the actual story with the two characters being interviewed and letting us in to their heads as the explain to us how it happened. It makes it easier for us to really feel their emotions and see how much they were affected by this experience. I think this documentary teaches us a great lesson and shows us that nothing is impossible. It reminded me of this saying in french "si tu veux, tu peux" Joe refused to die alone and went through great lengths to make sure he didnt. Very inspiring film!
ReplyDeleteDaphne Goudreau
Great job guys! Really well done and very thorough. I loved Touching the Void as a whole, and in my opinion, it is the perfect example of a situation where you have to consider your reality, weigh the two possible outcomes and make up your mind on what to do. Cutting the rope was an act harshly criticized by people after the fact, but it was a decision made by Yates and probably a smart one. But I think this cutting of the rope could represent more than just this desperate act in this film, I think it could also represent the desperate action we all must take in life to escape from a devastating situation. I just found that interesting.
ReplyDeleteKen Hamilton-Hodgson
Personally as someone who does not like movies typically, I very much enjoyed Touching The Void and I think that the way that you were able to summarize the movie very efficiently. This film changed my view on what a hero could be. As a child, I had always had the stereotypical Superman thoughts of what a hero was, and then growing up I thought that a hero had to affect a group of people, but this movie showed me that someone can be a hero in the eyes of more than just the people he has helped. It is understandable that Simon was criticized about his decision to cut the rope, but it would be better for one person to survive and tell the story as opposed to have two people dead and he would have had to deal with the fact that he left his friend to die as punishment for his choice, so I do not think that he needs the criticism from the climbing community.
ReplyDelete-Chris Kwok
Great entry you guys put together! Touching the Void was exciting to watch with an unexpected twist at the end. Most folks think of a hero as a person in tights running around fighting crime and protecting the city against felons. In the documentary, Joe is seen as a hero through everyone’s eyes for surviving the fall and coming back down against all odds. It just goes to show anyone can be a hero even for doing something as simple as saving someone from drowning in a pool. Policemen and firefighters are everyday heroes who sometimes go unnoticed in the media. Reality is heroes like Spider-man and Iron Man only exist in comic books and movies.
ReplyDeleteDelaxan Suthaharan
Superb blog entry!
ReplyDeleteThe profundity of thought meticulously implicated within the creation of “Touching the Void” was absolutely amazing. Through the outstanding story of these two bold, daring and passionate climbers, the director integrated fundamental enlightening aspects for the viewers to internally grasp. Our two main characters go on a journey that brings them to the peek of their capabilities, pushing them to their extreme limits and revealing the true deep self-determination of both. Each one of us has this within us, when confronted to a life-changing situation as this one brilliantly reenacted on camera and the director underlines this throughout the story. In the end the viewers not only come to see a beautiful film about heroism and the strength of one, but also understand that we can all do as such and that we are all heroes in the everyday tasks we accomplish, small or big. Our society must come to realize that we are much more than we assume, and that we are capable of things much grander than we can even imagine, all we have to do is trust ourselves and in what we believe.
Stunning entry guys, with really nice elaborated summaries. Even though I really enjoyed reading your blog and watching Man on Wire, i am one of those who believes in the famous quote: " You get what you deserve in life ". Indeed, for Touching the Void, both Simon and Joe what they were doing was really dangerous, at the base, and to continue climbing even in those bad conditions and the lack of supplies made what happen to them completely unlucky to predictable. Dont get me wrong, what Simon did after to stay is truely inhumain and heroic. But let's not forget that he was from second of dying and if it wasnt for the last minute luck, all his efforts would have been in vain, and we would say watching this movie that what happen to him was normal due to the conditions he was facing.
ReplyDeleteAlexandre Delisle