Monday, April 8, 2013

9- Our World Today



Our World Today
By: Audrey, Daniel and Sébastien

INTRODUCTION
This week, our team was assigned to talk about the film screened in class If a Tree Falls and a complementary screening, L'erreur Boreale. These two films raise awareness of environmental issues which affect us all, by focusing on the deforestation here in Quebec and showing how people react to deforestation similar to what we have here in If a Tree Falls. Both help us perceive our world better and be more informed about social issues which impact the world as a whole.

IF A TREE FALLS
If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front is an American documentary that was released in 2011. The film is 85 minutes long and is directed by Marshall Curry, an academy award nominated filmmaker, and Sam Cullman. The film was nominated for an Academy Award for best documentary feature (2012) and won the Sundance Film Festival award for documentary editing (2011) as well as many other awards. As the title suggests, the film sheds light upon the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), a radical environmentalist group in the United States considered by the US senate to be the nation's number one domestic terrorist threat. The film is focused around Daniel McGowan, an ELF activist convicted of domestic terrorism due to his implication is two cases of arson resulting in property damage to two lumber companies in Oregon. Daniel was imprisoned in 2005 and is now in a half-way house in New York City, he is to be released on probation in a few months.
What makes this film very interesting is that it is trying to be as objective as possible. The filmmakers interview multiple members of the ELF, the state and federal police responsible for the investigations into the timber arsons as well as the mill owners who were the victims of the arsons. Also, these interviews are generally very open and seem less scripted than some are in other films. This is really important because it grants the viewer a wider opinion (unlike in Michael Moore's films as we have seen), which lets them formulate their own. However, most viewers and the filmmakers are sympathetic towards the environmental cause because the activists are portrayed as heroes who are standing up for a cause and only destroying property. The former ELF members point out multiple times that the goal of the arsons was property destruction and that the conservation of life was of the utmost importance to the arsonists; there were no injuries or deaths across hundreds of fires.
The weekly topic for the class in relation to If a Tree Falls was that of ideologies. Ideologies can be defined as "the body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group." Ideologies can be local or widespread as well as partial or comprehensive. When an ideology is comprehensive (contextualizes the world) it can be defined as a worldview.  The film indirectly presents many ideologies which are in conflict within America, and our, society. The three primary ideologies examined are those of environmentalism (the activists), capitalism (the business owners) as well as law and order (the investigators). If a Tree Falls also presents how these three ideologies are seen under the scopes of democracy and neo-liberalism. For instance, from the activist's point of view, the government is not respecting their opinion (as seen in the parking-lot incident). In the owners' point of view, the law should protect them from acts such as arson and let them continue to expand their profits; often, legislation favors corporate interest in capitalist countries. As for the investigators, they believe that their sole responsibility as government agents is to uphold the law, regardless of their personal feelings. In this weeks' lecture, we also learned about how the media is needed to render service to the public by informing them and giving them nuanced opinions, the whole scope of the issue. Documentaries such as If a Tree Falls try to do this by presenting, with the least bias possible, the multiple opinions around social issues in order to make us more informed citizens.

For additional information about Daniel McGowan, visit: http://supportdaniel.org/

L'ERREUR BORÉALE
L’erreure Boréale a 1999 film made by Richard Desjardin, an author-compositor and interpret, along with co-director Robert Mondrie, runs for 70 minutes and shows us a shockingly new perspective on the deforestation industries and their impacts on Quebec and its wildlife. This documentary, gives us an inside look into this devastating industry. The director, Desjardin, takes the creative decision to shower us with scene after scene of forests that where completely clear-cut with only a desert of muck and tree stumps left behind. These images being shocking and maybe never before seen by the public, bring up feelings of sadness, frustration and helplessness that nothing can be done to stop these things from happening to our home. The deforestation industry being a major export for Quebec also plays a big part in its economy and keeps entire cities alive because of the amount of revenue that comes in by deforestation. The community being so money hungry, in a way fuels the fire that keeps these companies growing and expanding, to them deforestation equals money and money equals a good quality of life, but how much further can we push our natural resources? And how far are we willing to go until we realize that it is too late to turn back? L’erreure Boréale raises many of these questions and tries to answer them as best as it can. This documentary takes us on a journey through the north of Quebec showing us at what speed these operations are growing and expanding throughout our country and the vicious circles that are created because of it (the vicious circle: the impact of deforestation on wildlife: aquatics, animals, etc ). We also learn through various interviews with ecologists, owners of deforestation businesses, and people working for the government that the public is not well informed on this topic and that we should have the right to know more about what is occurring around us and to deny these greedy businessmen the right to abuse our natural resources.


This Documentary also raises different theories of ideology, as mentioned in the response If a tree falls an ideology is “the body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc ,. that guides and individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group”. Last week we where introduced to many types of ideologies, that of the environmentalist, capitalist, law and order, participative democracy, and more. One ideology that becomes apparent throughout the duration of L’erreure Boréale is the capitalist. This capitalist, essentially “has his own economic system; a system of producing, distributing and consuming goods and services based on the private ownership; the ownership of property by non-governmental legal entities of capital goods and the means of production, with the creation of goods and services for profit”. Since these capitalists are using one of Quebec’s most profitable natural resources, therefore influencing the course of our economy they have great influence and control over the government. The government is therefore not leading a democratic party that of which involves all eligible citizens to have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives, because it shelters the population from these problems to not risk having the people revolt against “the law that could not be effectively exercised and the threatening circumstances of threatening harm”.


ANALYSIS
 Both of these films seek to transform the way we perceive the world around us. They both relate to environmental causes that are very similar. These films take us out of our comfort zones in the sense that they show us ugly decrepit landscapes caused by big companies who clear-cut the forests in return for lots of money. In L’erreure Boréale he shows the viewer that things really are not the way we see them. By taking the camera in a helicopter Richard Desjardin is able to give us aerial views of the cuts that can’t be seen from the road because the foresters cleverly leave a 100m strip so that the general public will only see the magnificent trees that are left. If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front furthers this message by showing the viewer where the wood gets processed and the amounts of timber they go through in any given day as well as a few scenes of slaughterhouses.

Both films also show the political side of activism. Marshall Curry and Sam Cullman show us the front lines of the movements and protests where police brutality is a normal occurrence. L’erreure Boréale demonstrates the inner workings of politics by going to assemblies and meeting with government representatives who are the ones making the decisions and selling the land to the companies who cut the trees down.
Both of these films seem to provoke the viewer who can see that these people are really just trying to protect the environment because obviously a tree has little defense from a chainsaw. It only shows how really it is the citizens that have no voice when faced with something they don't like, and if they don't run away and be quiet, that's where the pepper spray is brought in. These films are able to demonstrate the different sides of democracy and politics, each in their own way. Something that makes the general public feel helpless and uneasy about our modern society. It goes to show that even if you elect a representative who vows to be working for you and your causes he is often working for a greater power and that is usually money or big companies. Things like this don't just happen on screen and in other countries, just look at the people who are running our city.

These films are very good at relating to their audiences because they show something that everyone has felt at one point or another: not being heard. At least once in your life you must have had something to say or an opinion about something, maybe a restaurant or where you’d like to spend your vacation, etc. but the person your trying to communicate with just wont listen. It’s this frustration that can make people act irrationally. You might simply cry or pout or maybe go off into your room and not come out for a few hours. It is also this frustration of not having a voice and not being acknowledged that makes people go out and protest. In our society protests and manifestations are normal occurrences because people have no other option. Just like L’erreure Boréale these things aren’t only happening in other parts of the world but literally in our very own city there have been multiple protests, manifestations and inevitably riots. These events should make you question the society you live in and question your government, go out and talk to your city council, email the representatives if you have concerns with something or would like to further inquire on a certain topic in your community. Mainly, be active and play your part by not sitting there and letting other people make choices.

Conclusion
These two films show how the democratic society we live in today is still not perfect; there I always room for improvements. The governing system does not always govern for the greater good like they should, but rather they make the rich richer and take advantage of those with no voice. Both of the films presented demonstrate different sides of the political world and can be interpreted as a call to action. In the famous words of John F. Kennedy: “ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.”

22 comments:

  1. I found the content of this entry to be good and helpful to undersand the two movies, however i feel like more effort could have been put in while publishing this blog. I can see that the fonts of the sections are different and the words that are underlined for hyperlinks are the type of words that you wouldn't expect to be underlined. With this said, i enjoyed reading the summary of l'erreur boreale. I found it to be a very insightful summary and it interested me a lot to the topic. I have once in my life seen one of these tree cutting sights with my own eyes and it made me think "why are we doing this? What good is it doing?" With all the new technology we have now we shouldn't have to be continuing to cut down trees.

    Jonathan Banks

    ReplyDelete
  2. I noticed the font was not consistent which affects the visual appeal.  The text is well written and easy to comprehend which makes the read enjoyable.  I agree with the group that the scenes of the trees being cut are very upsetting and frustrating.  It was shocking to know how much is really hidden from the population.  The roads are lined with trees but behind these trees there are no trees remaining. This blog is well written it could use some images or visual but the written part is well developed. Good Job!

    Nathalie Pearsall

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. An excellently written blog-post, although the lack of images--and the inconsistencies in the font-- may have decreased the visual appeal of the post, I enjoyed reading it a lot. Also, some of the structure of the post seems to be a little off. Sometimes, there's two pagebreaks between paragraphs and sometimes, only one.

    As pointed out in the previous comments, it was certainly shocking to see the trees being cut down and the police going to extreme--and sometimes violent--measures to ensure that the trees were cut down.

    I'm glad this with the revolution of technology, there are so many people that are only just discovering these long-term issues and are finally contributing to resolving these issues. With the new opportunities created by the possibility of film and Internet, let's hope that we will soon begin working towards a greener Earth.

    Hugo Cornellier

    ReplyDelete
  5. I understand that people want to be heard, but I think that out of respect for everyone that lives in the society, irrational actions should not be done under any circumstances. Everyone has different values and opinions and they should be respected. We are all trying to make it in this world, and burning places down is wrong on so many levels. Just out of curiosity, by burning things aren’t they creating pollution?

    People are allowed to defend themselves and protest, but I think that they need to keep their actions legal because if everyone was burning buildings down to defend their ideologies, there would be nothing left, we would live in ruins.

    That's my opinion on the situation. Great job on the blog, it was very easy to understand.

    Stephanie Nicholls-Dempsey

    ReplyDelete
  6. Really great job, the summaries provided were extremely thorough and well written. The analysis was also very insightful, and I thought the group did a wonderful job incorporating concepts discussed in class like ideologies into the text. I thought that the capitalism ideology was really depicted in a negative light in If a Tree Falls. The way the big industries were seen destroying our ecosystem really disgusted me. Also I found the actions of the police to be awful. They too fall into the capitalism ideology because they are controlled by the government which is influenced by the big money making industries. Despite all the violence, which was hard to watch, I still thought this was one of the best documentaries watched all semester.

    I also watched L’eurreur Boreale, which was very eye opening. I was very naïve before watching the film because I never realised how big an issue deforestation was within our own province. It’s important that we’re aware of these environmental problems. The movie was made over ten years ago. It’s hard to imagine that more forest could be cut down, but that’s the reality. Since that time, little change has been made and deforestation is still a major issue. Documentaries like L’eurreur Boreale and If a Tree Falls are awakening to the major environmental issues that surround us.

    Erin Brown

    ReplyDelete
  7. As mentioned, not being heard in our present society, even though we have a democratic system, is becoming more and more of a problem, and uprisings are becoming more frequent as a result of unhappy people that want and need to be heard. Having said this, I can understand the ELF's motives for burning buildings down, but I strongly think their actions need to stay legal, as Stephanie said. I believe that if they truly want any chance at getting their point across, they need to do so in a harmless, legal way so that a relationship of trust and understanding can be built between the authorities or people in charge and the group of activists.

    Laura Cloutier

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree that frustration can boil over and provoke irrational behaviour. But I still don't think it is necessarily justified in all cases. When these actions are putting other people at risk or jeopardizing the well-being of others, it is not justified at all. But it is a double edged sword. In most cases, that is the only way to get your point across to the neglecting and greedy politicians. I personally don't agree with the actions of the ELF because the fact that they are vandalizing properties and causing havoc, is overshadowing the point they're trying to get across. On one side I am saying that the violence and irrationality only hurts those that protest and peaceful and diplomatic negotiations can succeed (look at Gandhi!). But then I look at all the recent revolutions in the middle east powered by social media and I see otherwise. Then again, burning trees, and over throwing a government are two completely different things. It truly is debatable. All of that aside, great entry!
    -Amol Bhardwaj

    ReplyDelete
  9. Although your group has created a good blog and that we should not be affected by the font size, this mistake is still present and unfortunately reduces the quality of your presentation. Perhaps images and videos can as well captivate a reader’s interest. Despite these mistakes, the quality of the writing and content of the summaries are excellent. In addition, providing additional information about Daniel is vital since this gives a great biography on him, which explains deeply who this person is. In spite of our government advising us to take care of our environment and making sure that we protect our planet, the authority can be contradictory. People, such as Daniel who dare “take action” in order to protect the Earth, are sent to prison. Good work guys!

    - Jason Carrier

    ReplyDelete
  10. Regarding the blog context it was very well done, however, there was a lack of pictures and video. However the blog was well written showing great detail. I do agree that people can go to great lengths when they believe in something, shown in the film If a Tree Falls. Having said, that I feel like the director of the film made Daniel McGowan a victim of a lack for a better word, bad justice system. When in fact he is actually a terrorist because he is terrorizing communities and destroying properties.

    -Jacob Sverdlove

    ReplyDelete
  11. Overall the content of the blog was very interesting, also the written content. As a lot of people mentioned above: it is important to have the same font so you see a sort of formality. I also enjoyed watching: If a Tree Falls,in class. It was a sort of wake up call for me, to see how we live in a democratic country so is the United-States, however our voices don't have a lot of power against the authority and the government. It is unfair and we as a society should step up and raise against it. The only way the government, or the authorities will show us their attention, is if we use radical actions. If we do a peaceful protest, the government wont even acknowledge the problem. I believe it is really not a good strategy that the government uses. Just like the documentary we saw, the ELF, had to act in a radical way in order to get their point across. We should not have to be radical to get our point across.

    -Cynthia de Villers-Riel

    ReplyDelete
  12. Great job guys, very good entry!
    What I really found interesting in If A Tree Falls were two main things: the labelling of people as "terrorists" and the realities of the lives of these people being called terrorists. If A Tree Falls showed us that the ELF was labelled as a terrorist organization, and its members prosecuted and labelled as terrorists. This is where the term terrorist becomes blurry to me. A terrorist is a term for an individual who causes people to become unable to live their lives without being in constant fear of being in danger. This point is what I find interesting: McGowan was labelled as a terrorist, although his actions (things like lighting fires to vacant buildings) caused nobody to fear for their lives. It was mentioned in the film that in all the ELF's incidents, there were no deaths, and this was not a coincidence. I find this point interesting. Can they be terrorists if no human harm was caused?

    Also, it was interesting to see the lives of the people in the organization. The members of this terrorist organization, responsible for mass chaos and damage, seem to be just ordinary people, for the most part, who take issue with something, and found a way to deal with the situation which gets results. In no way am I saying what they did wasn't wrong, I just found it interesting to see what their lives were like underneath the media's blanket.

    Ken Hamilton-Hodgson

    ReplyDelete
  13. If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front was quite an interesting documentary. It made me think about my perspective on terrorism and question the police’s actions as well as those of the ELF. The blog covered the conflict between the three ideologies and the issue of not being heard in a comprehensive and complete manner. Well done!
    It’s a stretch to generalise that most viewers will feel sympathy towards the environmentalists. Some may see them as a nuisance to business, impeding profits, damaging the already unstable economy and causing trouble. Their protests can end in violence that may affect neutral sided bystanders who wanted nothing to do with the issue. However, given our current fragile environmental state, and the simple, everyday average guy portrayal of Daniel McGowan, people can easily relate to his world-view and sympathise with it. Also, it can be argued that the innocent, neutral bystanders’ attention should be grabbed so that they can get informed and potentially involved.
    -Chris Wegrzyn

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great entry you guys put together! I found the blog very interesting and perceptive. However, including images and keeping a steady structure throughout the post could improve the presentation. It was definitely shocking to see forests’ left with tree stumps all over and probing whether the forest will recover. The majority of those trees are over two hundred years old and can dramatically impact the environment. Even more upsetting to apprehend the amount of deforestation going on and being misled to think nothing terrible is happening. As the amount of consumption increases, we should seek to find a method to help prevent deforestation.

    Delaxan Suthaharan

    ReplyDelete
  15. The documentary If a Tree Falls: a Story of the Earth Liberation Front was such an interesting documentary and was filmed in such a way that did not victimize anyone. By displaying people’s opinions on the situation the audience would be able to comprehend the events which occurred and not judge anyone harshly. This documentary caught my attention, because of how radical the events were, for example climbing trees and remaining there till the police pepper sprayed you etc. None of the ideologies present in the film won me over, I agreed and disagreed with all of them equally. In the ideologies, environmentalism and law and order, they reacted in an extreme fashion, none of them ever taking the time to talk this out. I completely agree with the frustration factor you mentioned in your conclusion. These things are created because we become frustrated with how lazy or mindless people become, but sometimes it’s best to go about or frustrations in a civil manner, for both parties. It is sad to see something beautiful like a forest get cut down for consumerism. Especially when this is occurring in our backyards here in Quebec with mass deforestation. It’s upsetting to think that, as citizens of Quebec we do not have a vote on what they are doing to the forests, etc. because it’s a form of “private property”. Capitalists should not be making massive decisions like that on their own, because they have one goal, and that is to make as much money as possible, no matter the consequences. Yes, it’s fine to replant the forest, but even at that they’ll have to wait 50-100 years before they are of acceptable size to “harvest”.

    Over all, great work!

    -Madalena Valiante

    ReplyDelete
  16. The documentary If A Tree Falls: A Story of the Liberation Front was interesting to watch because deforestation is not something we think of everyday but, seeing some of the forest in the documentary was shocking. Some people are divided between both views, i talked about it the other day with my mother. I was for the environmentalist movement since they were trying to voice their opinions any way they could, though they did take it too far but we cant control everyone out there! My mother said that they shouldnt have vandalized other people business for attention, which is true.The introduction was good and i like how in the paragraph, they compared this documentary with Michael Moore documentary. The different font style does kinda throw you back when reading, seems like they were quoting but, over all it was good.
    -Coralie Dowd

    ReplyDelete
  17. I found that If A Tree Falls: A Story of The Liberation Front was very interesting. It was able to show a view that I rarely look from, that being the side of the activist. As a very business oriented person, it was intriguing to see why exactly the men and women of the ELF would want to sabotage the companies that are doing what they believe is wrong. It seemed that, despite trying to give the views of all sides, the director still made the corporations look like the enemies. If the companies destroy all of the environment they will be out of jobs and they are following the laws when it comes to replanting the trees that they cut down. And I think that if the environmentalists got their way and the tree cutting slowed down as much as they wanted, there would be issues with how much some things cost and I think that they are just being near sighted, but that is my opinion. I found that while reading the blog the change between font was a little offsetting, not a big deal but I think that if you kept the font style/size the same it would be a little cleaner.
    -Chris Kwok

    ReplyDelete
  18. I found that this blog made it very easy to understand both films. I really liked the conclusion when you were talking about the frustration factor. Personally, I think this was my favorite or one of my favorite films we watched in class, along with No Impact Man. This movie really grabbed my attention, especially when they showed the people staying up in the tree until they got pepper sprayed. I witnessed such determination; someone got pepper sprayed for a tree. There are millions of trees in the world and this person still stood up for this tree, which really shocked me but also made me frustrated with the police. Movies like No Impact Man and If A Tree Falls make me hate our world a bit but at the same time I’m happy I’m learning things I never did about it and that’s what documentaries are for. Another piece of this blog that I liked was the summary of L’Erreur Boreale since it was thorough and insightful and got me interested. One little complaint that I have was how the fonts changed but besides that I think this is a nice piece of work! Good work!

    Brent Rosenstein

    ReplyDelete
  19. Regardless of the blogs lack of visual appeal, the blog's content remained instructive and complete. The critical perspective of the films could have also been slightly more profoundly analyzed and reflected upon. Over all was good work !
    It’s absolutely fascinating to what extent malicious corporate media leaders can go to shape public ideologies and protect the real criminals of this world. Any information that could possibly jeopardize their secret fraudulent and devastating identity is kept buried deep underground from societies eyes. We live in a world that is being subject to highly manipulative leaders, cleverly hiding their fundament intentions and truth from the eyes of all. As a thread of their lies comes lose and their anonymity is partially revealed, drastic measures of corporate and government protection take place. False juristic accusations are made solely out of their protection. “If a tree falls” captures the reality of capital manipulation and of heroic enlightened acts that were made to make the public aware of their environmental destructiveness. Our world needs more “eco-terrorism” and less capital terrorism, in a system where heroes who fight for ecological justice are imprisoned and commercial murderers who slaughter our planet are rewarded.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I do like the fact that the ELF stood up for what they believed in, however I did not completely agree with their approach. Many documentary's appear to objective, however it is up to use to determine whether or not that was achieved. The film lead us to feel sympathy for the activists. sure the life of a person is a prioritized by the ELF, however we rarely take into account how the property damage actually effects the people who own the property, and assume they deserver it (at least in my case). How would you feel if you where walking home and suddenly your home was in a pile of ashes? The film definitely allows us to view the activists in a better lite, but I found it did not focus enough on the repercussions of their actions. Theses are just my frustrations with the film. I must say I enjoyed your blog entry, but I feel as though it could have drawn my attention better with pictures or images relating to your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  21. You know, there is a very clear message in both of these documentaries and it is trying to make people open their eyes and act. Having seen "L'erreur boreale" two years ago for a project in high school, I was aware of the problem encountered by these people and what saddens me most is that up to this day, I haven't done a single thing to help the cause. The motivation behind these documentaries is amazing and it really is a pure cause, but every time something like this is shown to the public, yes some do get affected and they put things in action, but it mostly doesn't change anything and that for one reason; people are scared, and that's how it's always going to be. They are scared for a very specific reason. That reason is even shown to everyone in "If A Tree Falls". The government! That's what everyone is afraid of. This situation where a population is afraid of the people who run it shouldn't even be possible, but it is happening as we speak. Whoever fights for their rights, or fights for a cause and becomes a problem to the government, will very quickly get shut down. This is not justice and this is not how things should happen in a society as advanced as ours. I could go on for ever about this but I will just stop there since my point is really clear and say that your article was really great.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Job well done!

    Having seen L’Erreur Boréale, I can say that the two movies offer a very objective view of the issues our society has encountered, in our day and age, with nature. This allows the viewers to create their very own opinion on the subject, often allowing for a more positive outcome then if it were to be imposed. Indeed, by watching both of these movies, we tend to want to make changes in our lifestyle to diminish the impact living as we do has on our planet. These changes tend to be much more durable then those we adopt after watching a strongly opinionated movie about Man’s destruction of nature, which is what the creators of such strive for.

    Gabriel Jalbert-Murray

    ReplyDelete

Your comments should address at least one of the following topics:
- The content of the entry (if there is anything you’d like to add, to precise, to nuance, to correct);
- Your understanding and experience of the films (ideas or emotions you didn’t have a chance to share or develop fully in class);
- Some comments on other films (fiction or non-fiction), which you feel are relevant to the entry and the weekly topic;
- Links to your personal experiences.

Don't forget to include your name!

(The comment feature is reserved to members from the Documenting Myths course - thank you for respecting this...)